Give your team back the hours nobody should be spending.

For plenty of things, yes — and if your case is one of them we will say so on the call. The difference shows up when the work has to happen on its own, every day, on your data and inside your systems: at that point a chat window someone pastes text into is not enough. You have probably seen impressive demos; the one that survives contact with your real data is a different thing, and that is the one we build.

Then we tell you, and you save yourself the project. It happens, and we would rather it happened in the audit than six months in. The map is yours either way: it tells you which processes actually cost you, even where the answer turns out to be better hiring or a fixed spreadsheet rather than a model.

Wherever you decide, and it gets decided before any code is written. We can work with models that run on your own infrastructure and never leave it, or with providers whose API terms exclude training on what they receive. Which one fits depends on what the data is, and it is a conversation to have at the start, not once everything is built.

On our side, yes. Article 50 has applied since 2 August 2026: an assistant has to say that it is one, and generated content has to be marked in machine-readable form. That comes as standard in what we build, not as an extra line on the invoice. What nobody serious will promise you is that your whole business complies, because the obligations depend on what you use each system for, and on the fact that whoever puts it into service under their own name is you. That is why the audit classifies every process — most back-office automation is not high-risk, and what is has until December 2027 — and comes out with the documentation and the Article 4 literacy training covered. We are not lawyers: our job is that when your counsel looks at it, there is nothing to redo.